Sunday, May 25, 2014

The Search for Relevance - 2

2. THE RELEVANCE OF DISCOVERY

Discovery  [dih-skuhv-uh-ree]
Noun
The act or an instance of discovering.

Samuel Langhorne Clemens, better known as Mark Twain is known to have said, "The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why." Yet most of us would tide through our lives not allowing ourselves to give too much thought to why we were born at all. This is an interesting fact in the light of Mark Twain's statement. Because an evaluation of the same would mean that many of us have never realized the 2nd most important day of our lives.

The problem with the search for relevance in our lives is that we do not want to have to engage in this search; yet our innate beings push us, even beg us to answer this question. It is a paradox of sorts because we can't seem to bear to live with the mystery; yet find it almost impossible to find an answer that is truly satisfying. It makes us miserable especially when nothing seems to be making sense, it makes us frustrated when we can't seem to get a handle on situations and bend them to our wishes; but mostly it makes us feel helpless when we can seem to do nothing but resign to our mundane daily lives with no particular logical end in sight. The search for relevance is the quintessence of our lives, yet it is the single most frustrating characteristic of being human.

I believe that the answer to our search for relevance lies in the act of discovering the relevance of our lives daily, one step at a time. By extension of the same, we have the premise that in the absence of the process of discovery for our relevance daily, we stand little or no chance of ever finding the answer that our very existence begs of us. How could that even be true?

Think about it this way:- If you find yourself in a market wondering why you are waiting in queue to buy some meat, chances are that you are there because:
a. you wanted to eat the meat and drove yourself there to buy it
b. you are running an errand for somebody near home who told you to buy the meat for them
c. you are accompanying somebody to the market and they kept you in queue to get the meat, while they finished shopping for other stuff
or d. you are either sleep walking / raving mad and are in the queue in the market to just stand there for no apparent reason

If your answers are a or b or c, you arrived at those conclusions by ticking off the obvious fact in play and trying to discover the most relevant truth to you at that time. If you were to however skip the entire discovery process and not tick off the obvious and most relevant truth pertaining to situation, you are faced the response d and immediately begin to wonder if there is no better explanation; because regardless of your persuasion about philosophical thought and method, our brains seem hard-wired to seek eudaimonian balance in the reason for what we are doing. In essence our brains are hard-wired to walk through a serious of analytical questions to answer reasonably why we find ourselves in that market queue; in other words we discover our reason for being there.

Our lives are very much like that market queue we find ourselves in. We do not know why we are there but we certainly need to know. As we analyze all possible answers to the same, we start by eliminating the obvious and work our way to an answer one step at a time; in other words, we discover our true purpose. The important thing to remember though is that this discovery is a process that cannot be bypassed. The same way that Einstein didn't know when he was 15 that he would hailed the greatest mind of the 20th century, nor did Mother Teresa know that she would be hailed as the icon of humanitarian outreach when she was 10. We need to go through our lives, discovering each day who we are; else we only land up bitter and disillusioned.

In this context, frustrating though it is many a time to deal with the same; it is easy to understand the relevance of discovery in our lives. But there is another reason that discovery is important to us - it is the crux of what makes our lives relevant and makes us who we are. From the time we are born we are always discovering something about ourselves - our likes / dislikes, our palette, our facial impressions, clothes that bring us looking close to our own self-image, our values and what we truly believe in, etc. This process of discovery is what leads us to finding our perceived true selves. Discovery is the cornerstone of the Philosophy of Self; without it, we would never be able to define ourselves.

Now lets consider an alternate viewpoint - literally. In order to find relevance, we know we must discover our selves, our lives and our purpose; frustrating as it is. But it would be of great advantage if we could analyze our lives from a lens other than our own. An external lens that has not limitations of its own, nor possessing biases that would render its viewpoint just as skewed as ours, would give us great insight into our lives and its purpose. Such an objective picture though can be gained only from a viewpoint that is far removed from our own lives, yet intimately able to perceive and capture even the finest details. Very much like an aerial camera can provide a whole new perspective to a soccer game, all it takes is a glance from a viewpoint high up and removed to completely change our perspective on the way we perceive things. The question though is, does there exist such an objective viewpoint; so far removed that it is unaffected and unbiased, yet so intimately connected so as provide us insights into our lives?

For me that is the ultimate viewpoint. There is not a time when i have stood on a seashore looking at the vast ocean or looked at the fluffy clouds from the window seat aboard a flight that i have not wondered just how constrained i am. More importantly, i wondered whether i would ever be able to understand things from such an objective viewpoint; given how constrained i am.

Sources:


Friday, March 14, 2014

The Search for Relevance - 1

1. THE NEED FOR RELEVANCE

Rel·e·vance [rel-uh-vuhns] 
Noun
The condition of being relevant, or connected with the matter at hand

We are born, live for about 60, maybe 70 years and then die. That's it! What is the point of our lives? For in the grand scheme of things (the 13.8 billion year old universe for example) what do those 60 - 70 years of your life count for? Or what do all our human lives put together count, for that matter?

The search for relevance is quintessential of the human experience. After all, to know the relevance of our lives is to know why it matters or how it is important. It is to understand why we are alive, where we fit in; it explains the reason for our existence. The search for relevance drives our lives, making us strive hard to find our niche. It is the reason for everything we have done, do or ever want to do. We spend our lives in such search; yet have no clue why we need to find the relevance of our lives in the 1st place. How are we to understand this need for relevance in our lives? Better still, we could start by asking do we need to understand it at all? After all, as Arthur Clarke is known to have said, "If we waste time looking for life’s meaning, we may have no time to live - or to play."

My wife and me have a 4 year old. Over the last year there has been one question he asks more than others - Why? He wants us to explain to him why were telling him to do / not do something, why some events played out a particular way, etc. In essence he keeps asking us the reason for things that concern / affect him in some way. It is part of our human nature to be curious. Curiosity is the only reason the human race has progressed so far. Edmund Burke would say, "The first and simplest emotion which we discover in the human mind, is curiosity." To not try and address our deep seated need to find relevance in our lives would be to kill our most fundamental emotion. Colorado State University's Psychology Professor Michael Steger studies meaning, how people find it in their lives and whether it matters. He found that people in general who find some overarching meaning or foundational purpose supporting the things they do and their beliefs - tend to better withstand the things life throws at them. It is therefore that i believe we need to understand it; for Socrates couldn't put it better when he said, "The unexamined life is not worth living."

The need for relevance in our lives stems right from our childhood where we feel the need to identify why we are doing / not doing a particular set of things. Robin Sharma said about the same, "The purpose of life is a life of purpose." This deep seated need for relevance doesn't come from a life altering event alone as much as from within ourselves. Viktor Frankl, an Austrian existential psychologist surmised that our dominant driving force is to find meaning in life; as he put it, "He who has a why to live for, can bear almost any how." It was Baumeister who suggested that the search for relevance in our lives is in order to address the need for self-worth. Steger's research showed a direct correlation between one's sense of self worth and the perception that their life had meaning. As my wife and me watched our son grow, there was a phase where he loved looking at himself in the mirror and admiring himself. Child psychologists will tell you that this is how children get accustomed to their reflection and find a sense of worth as a distinct human being. It is at precisely that moment (usually when a child is around 15 months old) that we find the beginnings of the need for relevance in our lives. So closely knit is this imagery of self-worth to our being that as we continue to grow (and explore the world around us), this search for relevance grows to become a need for relevance; the need to be us!

The need for relevance more or less peaks by the end of our (exploratory) teen years which having been spent trying to define and express ourselves so that others would take notice; moves on (in most) to settle down into a more passive form of 'this is me and this is my life' mode. When questioned, most people tend to look back at this mindset of their 20's sculpted look, as the basis of the relevance of the remainder of their lives. However the truth is, most people in their 60's would have a good laugh about what they thought their lives would be in their 20's. Goes to prove that our need for relevance is not a milestone reached; rather is a process of exploration and discovery over the period of our lives. This is because our need for relevance is not in one action or thought that lasts a lifetime; rather it manifests itself in short and widely spaced quantum leap growth patterns of learning and developing. This never ending search for relevance as long as we live, is what defines our lives and edges us on to achieve. For ultimately it is this same relevance that defines our human experience and sets us apart from other the species on earth.

Make no mistake, this quest for relevance is a frightening one. Yet, the truth is we as humans only fear meaninglessness more. It is probably this fear that drives me to write. But if you are somebody who takes literally the satirical writings of Kurt Vonnegut when he said, "We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different;" well this series is not for you. Curiosity did kill Schrodinger's cat; but there is much we can achieve if we do not limit our curiosity. A case to the fact is everything the human race has achieved. So, if you are anything like me - a normal thinking human being wondering about our search for relevance, i ask that you embark on this journey of discovery with me.

Even as we begin this journey, ask yourself - "Am I relevant?" May it be that we find more answers than questions along this journey. I also sincerely hope that we will be wiser (and therefore happier) by the end of this literary journey to discover relevance in our lives.


Sources:
7. http://www.strangenotions.com/if-atheism-is-true-does-life-still-have-meaning/
8. http://www.denverpost.com/ci_19754476
9. http://aeon.co/magazine/world-views/do-you-want-a-meaningful-life-or-a-happy-one/
10. http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2004/sep/20/features11.g2
11. The Experience of Meaning in Life
12. http://www.whattoexpect.com/toddler/toddler-growth-and-development/self-recognition.aspx#
13. http://www.iep.utm.edu/mean-ana/
14. http://www.spring.org.uk/2011/08/the-meaning-of-life-in-under-300-words.php
15. http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s9152.pdf
16. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Truth_is_relative,_understanding_is_limited/Meaning_of_life
17. http://www.bu.edu/paideia/existenz/volumes/Vol.4-2Diehl.pdf
18. http://www.mortylefkoe.com/why-create-meaning/
19. http://www.rationality.net/meaning.htm
20. http://www.lunacoaching.com/DragonPower/how-being-curious-brings-aliveness-in-your-life.html
21. http://www.iep.utm.edu/emerson/
22. http://appliedsentience.com/2013/11/08/4-ways-philosophers-answer-children-that-keep-asking-why/
23. Schrodinger - What is Life?
24. http://www.umatterucanhelp.com/index.php/the-need-for-meaning
25. http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/january/meaningful-happy-life-010114.html
26. http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kurt_Vonnegut

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

What is Life?

What is Life? It is a question that philosophers, theologians and scientists have been trying to define and answer for a long time. You might ask why should we care? Well to begin with, we are living beings, and that fact distinguishes us from most things in the Universe. Further still, we are among the few living beings in the Universe, so understanding the nature of life might be an important step toward understanding ourselves. And no, we are not talking about the meaning of life, the purpose of life or the philosophy of life. We are talking about the concept of life itself.

The Oxford Dictionary defines life as "the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity and continual change preceding death or the existence of an individual human being, plant or animal". NASA's working definition of life states, "life is a self-sustaining system capable of Darwinian evolution." While there are a multitude of definitions for the questions about the meaning, purpose and philosophy of life, it remains a challenge for scientists and philosophers to define life in unequivocal terms. This is difficult partly because life is a process, not a pure substance; especially "since life is such a ubiquitous and fundamental concept, the definitions of it are legion." as John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler espoused in The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. The nature of this problem can be understood by comparing this semantic task to the ancient Hindu story of identifying an elephant by having each of six blind men touch only the tail, the trunk, or the leg; what answer a biologist might give can differ dramatically from the answer given by a theoretical physicist, a philosopher or a theologian. 

Yet none of these issues stop us from trying to define life itself and understand its meaning, purpose and philosophy. The philosophical question of the definition of life has increasing practical importance in this age of science where almost all extra-terrestrial deep space probes (including Rosetta) seem to have 1 main fundamental purpose - to find, understand and explain life as we know it. While most of these efforts continue to take to biology, chemistry or physics; for the purposes of this blog post lets try to postulate a definition of life from a philosophical standpoint. 

There have been three main philosophical approaches to the problem of defining life that remain relevant today; namely Aristotle's view of life as animation; Descartes's view of life as mechanism; and Kant's view of life as organization. To briefly summarize and contrast the 3: Aristotle viewed life as any body / object / thing that is animated as a result of its soul which cannot exist by itself and has little to do with individual identity. According to him, each living being / object / thing is different because it / he / she is composed of varying compounds of form and matter. That is, different bodies / objects / things are animated by the same set of capacities, by the same (kind of) soul for each kind of object / thing / body. The soul therefore differentiated a living from a non-living thing / being. Descartes argued that the human body works like a machine and it follows the laws of physics. The pieces of the human machine, he argued, are like clockwork mechanisms. The mind or soul, on the other hand, is a non-material entity that lacks extension and motion, and does not follow the laws of physics. He went on to say, "I think, therefore I am;" that is to say that life is the object / thing / body being aware of its own being. Kant argued that all living beings / things exist in a self-organized fashion due to an internal purposiveness that accounts for the specificity of the structure of an organized being. As such, in contrast to a mere machine; organized and self-organized beings have formative force rather than just motive force; because of their soul or their being self aware. Thus life according to Kant, is an object / thing / body that has the ability to self-organize and produce within a set of process laws actualized by an external agent.

In short, these theories tell us that life is either a soul in a being / a self-aware being / a being able to self-organize and fend to keep itself alive. At the risk of being labelled as somebody who is pretty dumb, but acting smart, i posit an alternative definition for life as a unison of some aspects of the above 3 theories and more. Life is an organic being with a soul, that is self-aware, has the ability to self-organize and fend to keep itself alive in order to find and accomplish its purpose for being alive - which is to keep all other organic life going in its own way. This purpose becomes prime to all that is living and without it life doesn't exist; further this purpose doesn't come from being itself because it would mean having the ability to change the reason for its being - something no life is capable of doing. If life has died it is because it has exhausted its purpose contributing to ongoing life. A plant for example exists in order for it to multiply itself, while also providing of its produce to animal and man alike. Further it dies when it has played its part in keeping itself and other life going on - by ensuring that other life has been sustained by it in the past and will continue to be sustained by its multiplied forms in the future. A man / woman is alive in order to reproduce and also live out their lives in an attempt to keep other lives going around them. This causal action makes for the cyclical nature of life. So, in essence the purpose of life is inherent to life itself. As such, any definition of life should encompass such purpose.

Therefore, i would define life as a caused self-aware being with a soul, that has the sure ability to self-organize, produce and fend to keep itself alive with the purpose of keeping all other organic life going on; in its own way or form. This would then limit bots or humanoids as being counted for life because they do not have a soul nor an ability to produce. On the other hand, a bacterial form on a distant planet is definitely life; also the unborn fetus in the womb is also definitely life because both fulfill each of the above criteria. Hence a life as a legacy is a life that given more to the rest of life around it. Robert Frost is known to have said, "In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on." This truly is the essence of life - going on and hence i choose to characterize all life in this way as the on-going goings-on.

Though simplistic sounding, what do you think of the above as a philosophical definition of life?

Kant and the Unity of Reason By Angelica Nuzzo